Relatives
of a Hispanic teen shot dead by a white New York police officer are headed back
to court in January after winning a lawsuit in a case that could set the stage
for the family of slain teenager Michael Brown.
A day after a Missouri grand jury
declined to indict the white police officer in Brown's death, a jury hearing
civil cases in Bronx Supreme Court unanimously decided on Tuesday that the City
of New York and NYPD Sergeant Robert Barnett were liable in the 2005 death of 19-year-old
Leonel Disla.
The Bronx court will reconvene with a
new jury in January to decide how much it will award in damages to the family
of Disla, who was born in the Dominican Republic, the family's attorney, Ilaan
Maazel, said on Thursday.
Maazel drew a parallel with the Brown
case, which has sparked national turmoil over police relations with minority
communities.
Ferguson police said Brown was
unarmed but tried to get hold of the officer's weapon, while New York police
said Disla waved a 7-inch knife blade at officers trying to break up a fight -
a version of events Maazel challenged at the civil trial.
Barnett fired twice at Disla,
inflicting a fatal wound to the abdomen. The young man died a few hours later
at a local hospital.
Like in the Brown case, no criminal
charges were filed against Barnett, a veteran officer who said he acted out of
fear for his safety.
"In both cases there was no
special prosecutor investigating the police, and I think that's a
problem," Maazel said. "Police have a hard job but it's so important
that when a police officer violates the law that he's held accountable."
While no criminal charges were filed,
the teen's mother, Candida Disla, pressed a civil suit.
"The family has waited a very
long time to get some justice in this case," Maazel said.
Tuesday's verdict finding the city
and Barnett liable was the result of a successful appeal reversing a verdict
two years ago that cleared them of liability.
A lawyer for the city, Patrick
Mantione, said he opposed the second jury's decision.
"We respectfully disagree with
the second jury’s verdict and will evaluate our options," he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment